Unraveling the infra-ordinary (of the 21st century)
Contents
Field Research
people walking around while looking on their phones, calling someone, texting..*headphones to listen to music or talk to someone (still feels unfamiliar and strange if someone talks while wearing headphones)*man stands in the middle of the street, his arms raised up in the air, taking photos with an iPad, after a while he turns around 180° and takes a Selfie in front of the scenery he shoot earlier*20.9. from 15.20 walking around in the North of Rotterdam (noordmolenstraat) a lot of people walking around, sitting in cafes, shopping, some of them talking on their phones or looking on it while walking (head lowered). cafe from 16.11. two people sitting at a table (men and women)drinking a glass of wine, their smartphones lying on the table in front of them, man looks at the phone, they continue talking, the women leaves the table and the man takes his phone and holds it in front of his face, looks like his is taking photos, since he is sitting at the table opposite to me, he could be taking photos of me (feels unconfortable)* 8 women having wine together, every once in a while one of them lowers her head and does something on her smartphone, the conversations aren't interrupted*the waiter has a digital device to take orders, which looks like a phone, he looks like he is texting while taking an order*group of 5 men and 3 women, smartphones on the table and often on other objects like wallets or for example sunglasses on the phone
17.9.things I did today on my digital devices
8.30 woke up, answered on Facebook messenger, that we would Skype around 9.30
8.30 - 9.30; requested two new friends on Facebook, alarm clock at 09.00 (phone)
9.30 skyped until 10.30 (computer), images sent via Skype (phone - Skype version on the computer can't open photos)
since 10.30 listen to a remix, that was sent to me via iMessage (phone), short Facebook chat, checked my mails (computer), internet research, writing text (computer)
12.00 -12.36 watched an episode
13.29: answer to a previously read Facebook message, about rescheduling the evening appointment on Skype, (read-phone, answered-computer)
14.30 tried to connect with the wifi at city hall, password needed, unable to log in (phone)
15.15 called colleagues make plans
16.45 connected to eduroam/wdka, internet research, work (computer)
18.30 called someone in austria (phone)
19.00 connected to the internet at home (computer+phone)
until 22.00 checked emails, Facebook, research, watched a movie (computer)
(18.9.)
09.00 alarm clock (phone)
10.00-11.30 research, listen to radio, Facebook conversation about the plans on weekend (computer)
12.00 facebook message
12.30-14.00 work/research (computer)…
(Laptop/Smartphone is an important tool in everyday life. in terms of work, entertainment, communication and private/working relations. To communicate, gain knowledge, information, listen to music, watch films, watch series//Apps I use: Facebook, Facebook Messenger, Skype, Google Maps, Radio(Ö1), Youtube, for public transport(in Vienna/Austria)
The internet is taken for granted, Safari Browser, Camera, Messenger, Phone)
Research/Themes/Prototype
- Communication/Skype
Our digital devices are often used to communicate, with a specific person, a group of people or a more or less anonym audience. The feeling that everyone is reachable any time is created. (You are never alone any more, because there are so many ways of communincation) This is creating new globalized relationships. An increasing mobility of humans throughout the globe make the digital devices crutial.
Skype is creating a feeling of closeness, although you can't touch the person so are taking to or even look them in the eyes properly. In a way you fell futher apart from the people you skype with and at the same time it is nice to be able to see them. Disruptions in-between conversations cause problems, repetitions, video or audio transfer is delayed or stops, --> Skype Room, Skype Suit --> Hug Shirt (- wearable technology) - the world's first haptic telecommunication wearable How could Sykpe trigger other senses like touch? With the Hug Shirt you can sent hugs to the person wearing it.
The Hug Shirt is not meant to replace human contact, but to make you happy if you are away for business or other reasons and you miss your friends and loved ones. It also has some very interesting applications in the medical field with the elderly and children. And it is fun to use and very soft. How could human interaction develop if devices and tools like the Hug Shirt would improve, so it's able to commincate touch more realistically?
- Virtual Reality
The computer-generated simulation of a three-dimensional image or environment that can be interacted with in a seemingly real or physical way by a person using special electronic equipment, such as a helmet with a screen inside or gloves fitted with sensors. (Oxford Dictionaryies)
How much time do we spent in different virtual realities?
How will virtual reality develop and improve (imitating reality) in the future?
Under which circumstances would we stay in a virtual reality?
How would we describe the digital culture to aliens?
(oculus rift, motion suit, smart gloves//digital devices as extension of the human body f.e. Biohacking (DIY Body Modification) [1]
During the research I got really interested in the work by Jon Rafman, who is a Canadian artist, filmmaker and essayist.
In his work and films he is exploring the impact of technology on contemporary consciousness, frequently using images he finds on the internet.
He is well-known for his project called 9-eyes, where he is collecting and exhibiting images from google maps.
The images often show violent content and raise the question if he actually found them on google maps or staged them for his project. Therefore questioning the representation/imitation of "reality" on internet platforms. The thought that google maps could be releasing images like the ones Rafman shows create a feeling of unease. 9-eyes: [2] He is also working with short movies, the most intesting for me where videos like Mainsqueeze, Still Life (Betamale) and Popova-Lissitzky Office Complex. Videos on vimeo: [3]
Conception/Planning : Virtual Realities (“Magazine”)
in collaboration with Judith van der Heiden [[4]]
Our starting point was the observation, that we (a lot of people living in the 21th century) spent a lot of time on our digital devices. They are used in different parts of everyday life, like working, communicating and entertainment and present an access to digital reality. We understand digital reality as a form of virtual reality, although the term is mainly used in a video gaming context.
From our point of view, the virtual reality could be understood as a parallel reality one could enter through different social media platforms, interactive games or google maps.
We became interested in the different digital devices like the oculus rift or motion tracking suits, which function as an access to the virtual world. It's interesting how those devices are being used and which affects they have on the human body or trigger all five senses, for instants the oculus rift often makes a lot of people lose their balance. Another important aspect was, the question of how much time in virtual reality is healthy and at which point it's turning into an addiction. In terms of gaming addictions is often said by affected persons, that the seams between reality and virtual reality are starting to break down, if you spent a lot of time in virtual reality. The virtual world can be so seductive and realistic, that it becomes more interesting than the "real" world.
Our speculative approach to the theme, made us think about a future, in which the virtual world became so real, that it could be mistaken for the "real" world/outside world. In that scenario the virtual world would be accessible to a broader public.
Under which circumstances would people stay in virtual reality forever?
How must the interactive digital devices develop to make people wanting to stay in virtual reality?
How would such a world look like?
How would human interaction change? Could a new more direct form of communication develop?
We would like to speculate about this future world and design a magazine (placeholder word) that would be published in and about this future. In the context of this magazine our current time, would be called post reality and people spent most of their time in different virtual realities. The content of the magazine would be based on our research and fictional ideas about the future.
An important point about the project was the question of media and form of presentation. Since a printed magazine is a very contemporary medium, we thought about using new digital technology to maybe create an interactive magazine, one could walk though. Maybe using different gestures of our everyday life, like swiping, zooming etc. We decided on using holograms to depict our ideas.
Having more than one of these holograms placed in a darkend room, could create the feeling of walking though the magazine/a virtual world.
As a starting point we made two videos, one showing a possible logo of the magazine and another one working Google Maps and computer generated voices.
In this context Google Maps function as an example for an easy accessible virtual reality, which makes it possible to go to a lot of places virtually. The world is virtually mapped and shown in a specific way, which is now common knowledge. Using this well known aesthetics on one hand shows a contemporary approach to virtual reality and shows on the other hand possibilities to think about ohow the technology could develop.
To watch the videos: [5]
"Everything we experience can be reduced to electrical activity stimulating our brains as our sensory organs deliver information about the external world.
This interpretation is what we consider to be "reality."
The brain is reality.
Everything you see, hear, feel, taste and smell is an interpretation of what's outside, and created entirely inside your head.
In your head you can create whatever you want. You can be whoever, whatever, where ever you want to be.
This is what virtual reality holds out to us - the possibility of walking into the constructs of the imagination."[6]
Hologram/Medium
First Test:
Final Project
For the final project/presentation we decided to focus on a fictional character/user, who's spending most of her time in virtual reality. It's a speculative approach and we placed the whole scenario in a future.
Working on a theme like this we are influenced by our own experience and imaginations, but of course also by SciFi Movie, series and images.
Already existing technology played an important role in terms of inspiration for the project. As well as contemporary visual language.
We working on an installation depicting the life of that person.
The installation consitis of four parts:
- The physical appearance of a person in virtual reality. (Hologram)
- the surrounding/navigation in VR. Shown in a video. Using found footage. (Hologram)
- the User ID of that person. (Hologram)
and
- a sound piece about everyday life in virtual reality.
Appearance
To depict our ideas about appearance in virtual reality, we made holograms out of some of our classmates and ourselves.
We took videos of each person from 4 angels, edited and positioned the video clips in FinalCut.
In virtual reality the appearance will be variable. Everyone will be able to look different at any moment.
To show this idea, the separated videos are morphing into each other.
Surrounding
To show our ideas on navigation in virtual reality, we sticked to our initial idea of using Google Maps and combined it with footage found on the internet. The footage is showing images of interior-, landscape design and architecture in a very smooth, flat and clean manner [7]. I mainly used an Architectural Animation Reel from 2014 made by a company called DOF (Depth of Field - refering to a photographic techniques), which shows an animated walkthrough luxurious houses and neighbourhoods all over the world. I find it interesting to think about the relation between virtual reality and luxury.
How would the virtual living, working spaces and neighbourhoods look like, if everyone could just design their surroundings according to their imaginations and desires?
I believe it would look crazier, that the images we chose. It was interesting for me to work with footage that's close to our contemporary visual language and reality.
ID Card
The ID Card represent the way of identification in VR through a Username. At the same time this hologram is functioning as the title for the project.
USER 8642XH
We always communicate through our user name. Therefore we have become our user name.
Everyday Life (Sound Piece)
The spoken text for the audio file is a combination of quotations of texts we read during our research, our conversations and statements on virtual reality. Source: [8]
Text:
"Everything we experience can be reduced to electrical activity stimulating our brains as our sensory organs deliver information about the external world. This interpretation is what we consider to be "reality."
The brain is reality.
Everything you see, hear, feel, taste and smell is an interpretation of what's outside, and created entirely inside your head.
We are all living in our own simulation of the "reality".
In your head you can create whatever you want.
You can be whoever, whatever, whereever you want to be.
This is what virtual reality holds out to us : the possibility of walking into the constructs of the imagination.'
USER 8642XH
We always communicate through our user name. Therefore we have become our user name.
LIVING IN THE VIRTUAL REALITY PRECISE GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATIONS AREN'T IMPORTANT ANYMORE.
THERE ARE NEW WAYS TO MEET.
I live in a small apartment. Consisting of a small bedroom, a bathroom and a VR room. The VR room is the device to enter virtual reality.
EVERYTHING IS HEAVIER AND SLOWER IN POST REALITY.
After I'm done with my morning routine, I go to the VR room and enter virtual reality. I have access to 70% of common virtual space, but I want to buy 100% access.
YOU ARE ABLE TO DESIGN YOUR APPEARANCE EVERYDAY!
THE DIGITAL DEVICES MAKE IT POSSIBLE TO VISIT THOUSANDS OF PLACES!
I'm working in a private space in VR, which is open to the public during certain opening hours. We are connected through our thoughts, dreams and emotions. Either we are present as virtual bodies, written text or disembodied voices.
INSTEAD OF HAVING TO USE LANGUAGE. WE CAN LITERALLY SHOW EACH OTHER WHAT WE MEAN. IT'S LIKE WALKING INTO CONSTRUCTS OF IMAGINATIONS.
WE HAVE TWO MINDS: AN INDIVIDUAL AND A COLLECTIVE MIND.
For meetings we use the collective mind. Decisions are made faster this way.
IN VIRTUAL REALITY EVERYTHING IS EASIER, LIGHTER AND FASTER.
You just think of the place you want to go and after a short time of loading and processing you are there. During my breaks I sometimes go to the Alps for skiing. I do a lot of different sport activities, so I can return to work more relaxed and active.
BE IN CONTROL OF YOUR LIFE.
BE IN CONTROL OF YOUR WORK.
BE IN CONTROL OF YOUR LEISURE TIME.
CREATE YOUR OWN LIFE.
YOU CAN BE WHATEVER, WHERE EVER, WHOEVER YOU WANT TO BE."
We used different computer generated voices provided by the Mac Computer and a site/programm called NaturalReaders.
Abstract
We started to be interested in virtual reality, because of our observation, that we spents a lot of time on online platforms. For instance Facebook, Instagram or Tumblr are virtual representations of our lives and personality and we seem to spent a lot of time with the perfection of our digital representation/appearance.
The fact that we already spent a lot of time online and therefore in a sort of virtual reality of everyday life, is something we need to reflect on. Where is our life actually happening online or offline? Although we believe there are also opportunities and positive aspects to our online life, networks and virtual realities, we still believe, that we need to think about our own position with contemporary online culture and how it could develop.
This thought led us to be interested in devices like the oculus rift, which represents an direct access to virtual reality. The quality of digital visual language is getting more real and precise.
What would happened it the virtual reality got so real, that we couldn't tell the difference any more? That was a starting point for our project.
How would a future look like were we spent the majority of our time in virtual reality? How would that reality look like?
We shifted away from our initial idea of making a walkthrough magazine to an installation, making aspects of how we imagine virtual reality in the future visible and audible.
Using the technique/medium of the hologram and video, we are showing appearance, navigation, representation and everyday life in virtual reality in the future.
Presentation (10.11.) + Documentation
For the presentation on the 10.11. we made an installation consisting of the 4 elements described in the previous text (Username, Appearance, Navigation, Everday Life). Three socles where positioned in a triangle behind a temporary wall, which represented the entry to VR. The sound piece was audible in the whole room and the audience was able to move freely in the installation. The sound piece showed analogies to the images shown in the hologramms.
Q10/Continuation of Unraveling the infra-ordinary/Virtual Realities
in collaboration with Judith van der Heiden
Recap + Outlook&Possibilities
How we would like to continue The installation as a form of presentation will remain. The question is how to bring the elements of the installtion closer to each other, interweave them and let them interact more directly.
- Interaction between sound piece/text and images → guide the audience through the installation
- Work on the sound piece. Use different (more human) voices.
- Use more words for the Logo/Titel according to the sound piece/text
- Kinect: Interactive installation?
Big questions:
- How could the entry to VR look like?
For example images of people wearing the oculus rift (Projection; narrow passage)
- How should the audience be guided through the installation? Loose or strict guidance?
Entry + Open Space (similar to the installation on the 10.11.) Maze → specific way to walk through, with three stations in a logic chronology
- Which media should we use for which element?
Different Media (proposal):
Hologram (Username + Appearance)
Projection (Navigation + Entrance)
Sound Piece (Headphones or Speakers; possibly reacting to the movement of the audience?)
Research
- DocLab:Seamless Realitiy [9]
(“RecoVR: Mosul, a Collective Reconstruction” by Ziv Schneider and Laura Chen)
Visiting the exhibition Seamless Reality gave us the opportiunity to experience many different project realized with the oculus rift.
"Discover the latest web documentaries, virtual reality experiences and interactive installations in the non-stop Seamless Reality exhibition, featuring more than 25 installations that break through the boundaries between our physical and digital worlds and allow visitors to experiment with the possibilities of virtual reality, artificial intelligence and biometric technology." [10]
Thoughts + Remarks:
General Information: The exhibition showcased thirty projects (installations/interactive projects), focused on the future of documentary storytelling and on the current state of using new digital devices in an artistic and scientific field.
About half of the projects where dealing with virtual reality and shown with the oculus rift. In order to see those projects it was necessary to make a reservation at reservation desk next to the entry of the exhibition. When we were there the waiting time wasn't too long and it was possible to see almost all the projects within 30mins. During the “waiting time” we could see the projects, which were realized in other media for example computer games (“Walden, a game” http://www.doclab.org/2015/walden-a-game/) videoinstallations or websites (“Lahore Landing” http://www.doclab.org/2015/lahore-landing/).
The time slots for each oculus rift project differed from 15 to 45 minutes. Some of the projects were interactive in the sense of a computer game, where you could walk around using a gaming controller and others where more like filmic documentation, which a certain duration and dramaturgy. The inherent qualities of the oculus rift were used and had significance in all the projects. Depending on the position of your head, different angles of the shown projects became visible.
Current Issues: An interesting aspect of the exhibition was, that a lot of projects were dealing with current political questions and serious topics. For example “Kiya” by Nonny de la Pena (http://www.doclab.org/2015/kiya/) was dealing with the battle against domestic violence. As a viewer you were put in the position of an eyewitness to a dangerous situation. Projects like that want to trigger a feeling of involvement and empathy by bringing a problematic situation closer to the viewer.
The project “RecoVR: Mosul, a Collective Reconstruction” by Ziv Schneider and Laura Chen http://www.doclab.org/2015/recovr-mosul-a-collective-reconstruction/) is virtually reconstructing the historical collection of the Mosul Museum and archeological sites in Mosul, which was destroyed by IS and Levant (ISIL) on June 10, 2014. The reconstruction is based on crowd sourced imagery. As a viewer it's possible to walk trough a virtually rebuild museum. Although the concept and idea of the project is intriguing and meaningful, but because of the typical visual language, which reminded of computer games, the experience was visually a bit disappointing. This project raised the question if using the oculus rift was the right choice or if the visual experience was distracting from the actual message and critical power of the project.
Some other projects, which often weren't involved in current political questions, explored the possibilities of the visual language and experience with the oculus rift.
Position of the viewer: Visiting the exhibition we were using the oculus rift for the first time and that in itself was an important experience for us. Wearing the oculus rift put the viewer in an awkward position, especially in the context of an exhibition, where a lot of people are walking around and looking at you. On one hand it's the state of withdrawal from the current situation into a new visual and audible world and on the other hand the situation creates a feeling of exposition, which it actually is, because the viewer isn't able to notice what is happening in the exhibition space. In the situation it's easy to loose your sense of orientation and even the sense of balance.
Accessibility (elitist?): The use of oculus rift within exhibition spaces isn't established yet. The procedure of making reservations and spending a predetermined amount of time with each projects made it difficult to see the whole exhibition. It wasn't possible to experience the exhibition at an individual pace. At the same time it was very interesting to visit Seamless Reality , because the use of the oculus rift within the art field will establish new exhibition formats and theoretical discourses.
- SEEING I by Mark Farid [11]
The Artist Mark Farid plans on spending 28 days wearing wearing a VR headset and a pair of noise-canceling headphones living the life of an other person. During that time Mark Farid will be living in a gallery space and the only thing he'll be seeing is, what the other person is doing. He already did a 24hour test, after which he did have any after effects. At the same time the search for the other person is going on, who has to be a male heterosexual living with his partner. The presence of a partner is necessary to give Mark the opportunity to get to know the other person through conversations. He'll be eating, what the other one is eating, showering, when he is and so on, but he'll stay in the same gallery space for the whole time.
It's dealing with the question of how our identities and experiences are constructed. How could the behaviour of the artist could change during that period of time? Will he believe, that he is the other person? Will he loose the grip of his personal reality? Will his identity and personality change?
There is still a crowdfunding project (launched at the end of 2014) going on, to collect enough money to realize the project, because all lot of people are going to be needed to take care of the artist, who won't be able to take care of himself. He'll be under surveillance of doctors, psychiatrists
and eye specialists during the whole time. In case of possible longterm after effects the experiment would be interrupted.
Interesting Link:
Launching Event: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-a32w6HRxgU
Talk by Mark Farid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLWEM6B_UsA
The Verge: http://www.theverge.com/2014/11/18/7235895/seeing-i-artist-to-spend-a-month-in-virtual-reality
Vice: https://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/mark-farid-seeing-i-live-through-an-avatar-122
Planing
Choices we made after the expo
● Adding the transition as the starting point of our installation
● Changing the shape of our installation room to intensify the transition
Building plan for our installation.
The installation could contain sensors creating an interaction between the visitors image and sound.
The transition could be visualized through projector projecting an image of people wearing the glasses.
Planning and organisation
Chronological order of the videos based on the sound piece
File:!!sequence of installation!!.pdf
Sound Piece + Word Animations
Experiments with tinkercad.com:
Colortest:
Words/Hologram
Spatial Set-Up
We decided to present in WH.02.906 Installation Room IAS, because it's easy to darken the room and we would have enough space. Using black and white fabric, we divided the room into two sections and created a screen in one part of the room.
Floor plan/Transition: After the first presentation, which ha a focus on how virtual reality could look like, and during feedbacks the question on the transition from “post” to virtual reality became interesting to us. How could the change between those two realities become perceptible? The started thinking about the shape and construction of the room. For this reason the room divided into two parts (using black and white curtain), one focusing on a representation of the transition to virtual reality and the other one on virtual reality – on what someone wearing the oculus rift could probably be seeing. Each part is showing different types of imagery depicting how we imagine a future reality.
Tests:
We used glow in the dark tape to change the shape of the socles.
Final Design
For our final presentation we decided on a spatial installation. At our first presentation we already had some of the elements, which we refined and developed during Quarter 10. The installation consists of two sections (divided by a curtain), one part represents the virtual reality from the outside (and therefore the Post Reality) and the other part represents our ideas on virtual reality. Shown with three holograms, each dedicated to a specific focus, but showing all elements. Furthermore we reworked the sound piece, changed the structure and the voices and edited the videos according to it. As a result the holograms and the sound piece are interacting. Words and images are lighting up or fading out according to what is being said in the sound piece. The videos in the installation will be played in a loop.
Collaboration
The project was realized in collaboration with Judith van der Heiden. Overall the workload was well divided between the two of us and the projects is based on our conversations and imaginations on the future development of virtual reality. We did research in different directions and I was focusing on an artistic approach, dealing with artists like Jon Rafman and Mark Farid. Since Judith has a broad knowledge on different programs and techniques, she came up with the idea of using a simple method to create holograms and found the program tinkercad.com, which we used to create some of the holograms. Coming from a fine arts background and focusing of video art, I did a lot of editing. Furthermore I focused on the audio piece. We decided to use both found footage and videos we shot in the AV Studio of WDKA, so an important part of working was selecting and editing video material and deciding on the shape of the installation. For the research paper, I was mostly responsible for writing the text, while Judith was concentrating on the form and presentation of the paper. Overall the whole collaboration was a nice experience and I believe we learned a lot from each other.
Research Document
Follow this link: [12]
