Difference between revisions of "DigitalCraftMinor2015"

From DigitalCraft_Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
== Minor DAY Planning ==
+
== Minor Daily Planning ==
  
 
'''MONDAY'''
 
'''MONDAY'''
Line 16: Line 16:
 
* WORK!
 
* WORK!
  
== Quarter Planning ==
+
==Fantastic Forgeries Mentoring/Tutorial Sessions ==
 
 
 
 
=== Quarter 1 ===
 
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|-
 
|-

Revision as of 12:19, 15 September 2015

Minor Daily Planning

MONDAY

  • WORK!

TUESDAY

  • WORK!

WEDNESDAY

  • WORK!

THURSDAY

  • WORK!

FRIDAY

  • WORK!

Fantastic Forgeries Mentoring/Tutorial Sessions

Date & Time Classes TODO
Sept 15 Tools & Tech / Fantastic Forgeries Project Launch
Sept 22 Tools & Tech (morning)/ Practice & Research (afternoon)
Sept 29 Tools & Tech / Practice
Oct 02 Research (morning)
Oct 06 Tools & Tech / Practice Studio-Practice – Tools & Tech Tutorials – Practice & Research Mentoring
Oct 08 Research (morning)
Oct 13 Tools & Tech / Practice / Research
Oct 27 Tools & Tech
Oct 30 Museum of Fantastic Forgeries (Final Presentation)
Oct 31 Open Day Exhibition


Evaluation

Your Fantastic Forgeries presentation is your first integrated assessment with you will receive a final mark Research and Practice(&Tools&Tech) . You will have 6 minutes to present, with 6 minutes of questions. 2 of your 6 minutes are dedicated towards the context of your chosen artefact.

In your presentation you are required to:

Critically reflect on your process, pointing to the knowledge and skills learned;

Connect your projects to practices of both craft and technology;

Frame your research and practice based results within the context of the assignment;

Defend the relevance and potential of your research and practice based results.


Deliverables:

Q13


1. A copy of your chosen artefact from the Boijmans collection using digital fabrication technologies;

2. A well-fabricated contemporary transformation(s) based on your chosen object of the Boijmans collection;

3. Polished project wiki page

4. Context visualisations

6. Exhibition Presentation


Evaluation Criteria:


1.The student is knowledgeable of the historical context of their project's themes, and has positioned/critically reflected upon new contexts in relation to the minor (i.e. craft, fabrication, authorship, appropriation, experimentation and relation to personal practice/signature).

2. The student has defined a clear, profound, and independent method of research, which is visible in the design/artistic process.

3. The student has a rigorous approach to experimentation, which is visually presented as a coherent process.

4. The student has conceptualised and executed high-level, innovative, and original works.

5. The student has taken advantage of the technical instruction and technologies/tools offered, and has demonstrated a willingness to push their skills further.

6. The student has a motivated choice and proper defence for a specific a technology in their execution of their final assignment.