Sign up for time-slot

From DigitalCraft_Wiki
Revision as of 20:55, 28 October 2015 by Lucashartman (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

30 October 2015 - Fantastic Forgeries Presentation

The Museum of Fantastic Forgeries presentation is your first integrated assessment and you will receive a final quarter mark for both Research and Practice . You will have 6 minutes to present, and 6 minutes of questions/defence. 2 of your 6 minutes should dedicated towards the (historical) context of your chosen artefact. We ask you to be present for either the entire morning or afternoon session, and you are more then welcome to be present for both. The presentations will take place in the back (fishbowl) room of the interaction station.

In your presentation you are required to:

  1. Critically reflect on your process, pointing to the knowledge and skills learned;
  2. Connect your projects to practices of both craft and technology;
  3. Frame your research and practice based results within the context of the assignment;
  4. Defend the relevance and potential of your research and practice based results.

Deliverables

  1. A copy of your chosen (pre-industrial) artefact crafted from a different medium;
  2. A well-fabricated contemporary transformations based on your chosen artefact;
  3. A polished project wiki page;
  4. A 1000 word statement defining where your specific 'craft' lies in relation newer technologies (Uploaded to the wiki);
  5. An exhibition presentation, research visualisation, and oral presentation.

Criteria

  1. The student is knowledgeable of the historical context of their project's themes, and has positioned/critically reflected upon new contexts in relation to the minor (i.e. craft, fabrication, authorship, appropriation, experimentation and relation to personal practice/signature).
  2. The student has defined a clear, profound, and independent method of research, which is visible in the design/artistic process.
  3. The student has a rigorous approach to experimentation, which is visually presented as a coherent process.
  4. The student has conceptualised and executed high-level, innovative, and original works.
  5. The student has taken advantage of the technical instruction and technologies/tools offered, and has demonstrated a willingness to push their skills further.
  6. The student has a motivated choice and proper defence for a specific a technology in their execution of their final assignment.


Pick a time by filling in your name below:

10:00 - 10:15: Joeke van der Veen
10:15 - 10:30: Denise Nedermeijer
10:30 - 10:45: Jermaine van der Kolk
10:45 - 11:00: Sanne Verkleij
11:00 - 11:15: Robin Hendriks
11:15 - 11:30:
11:30 - 11:45:
11:45 - 12:00:
12:00 - 12:15: Tineke van Hilten



13:00 - 13:15: Lizet van der Knaap
13:15 - 13:30: Remy Konings
13:30 - 13:45: Lucas Hartman
13:45 - 14:00: Ciska Swaak
14:00 - 14:15: Christopher Noort
14:15 - 14:30: Tim Demper
14:30 - 14:45: Michelle Lievaart
14:45 - 15:00: Thom Trouwborst
15:00 - 15:15: Dionne Wolff