Difference between revisions of "User:Ilja.sofia"

From DigitalCraft_Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
=Ilja Sofia=
 
=Ilja Sofia=
  
*Ilja Sofia van Vlaardingen
+
ILJA SOFIA VAN VLAARDINGEN
*Rotterdam
+
<br>24 | ROTTERDAM
*[http://iljasofia.nl portfolio]
+
<br>[http://iljasofia.nl PORTFOLIO]
 +
<br>
 +
 
 +
http://i58.tinypic.com/zxk56e.jpg
  
 
=Fantastic Forgeries=
 
=Fantastic Forgeries=
Line 53: Line 56:
  
 
====Typography====
 
====Typography====
 +
 +
[[File:Tekst.png]]
 +
  
 
Sans serif type, designed by Jacob Jongert, only for Van Nelle
 
Sans serif type, designed by Jacob Jongert, only for Van Nelle
  
 
[[File:Typo.png|450px]]
 
[[File:Typo.png|450px]]
 
 
====Out-of-context mapping class====
 
====Out-of-context mapping class====
  
 
'''Why interesting'''
 
'''Why interesting'''
# Impact first World War, De Stijl, Bauhaus, Constructivism  
+
* Impact first World War, De Stijl, Bauhaus, Constructivism  
# Beginning advertising, first artist to design products for commercial purposes
+
* Beginning advertising, first artist to design products for commercial purposes
# It's already a reproduction
+
* It's already a reproduction
# Difference between the value of the product then and now (a gulden—750 euros)
+
* Difference between the value of the product then and now (a gulden—750 euros)
  
 
'''Technique'''
 
'''Technique'''
Line 83: Line 88:
 
*A save
 
*A save
 
*Cigarettes
 
*Cigarettes
 +
 +
====Web====
 +
Some screenshots of websites.
 +
 +
[[File:Websites.png|600px]]
  
 
==Imperfections==
 
==Imperfections==
  
One of the most interesting things about the object, in my opinion, is the difference between its value then and now. Why would people pay 750 euros for it in 2014 when it used to be a worthless tin, given freely to customers in the 20's? I found out people love it because of its scratches and dents; its imperfections. I thought this to be a very interesting and unique approach for my replica.  
+
One of the most interesting things about the object, in my opinion, is the difference between its value then and now. Why would people pay 750 euros for it in 2014 when it used to be a worthless tin, given freely to sellers in the 20's? I found out people love it because of its scratches and dents; its imperfections. I thought this to be a very interesting and unique approach for my replica.  
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<br>I associate those imperfections with pixels.
 
<br>I associate those imperfections with pixels.
 
<br>'''imperfections ≠ pixels'''
 
<br>'''imperfections ≠ pixels'''
 +
<br><br>
 +
When you zoom in on the object you can easily see the pixels and therefore a whole range of colours.
 +
<br>The design used to be loved because it only had three colours (yellow, red and blue) and now it has a lot more.
 +
 +
[[File:Pixels.png|400px]]
 +
 +
The technique I thought to be perfect for showing the colour range and relief is '''2.5d printing'''.
 +
 +
[[File:25dprinting.jpg|500px]]
 +
 +
[[File:25dprint2.jpg|500px]]
 +
 +
[[File:2.5D.jpg|500px]]
 +
 +
I'm now busy trying to get the artists [http://www.jannieschmitz.nl| Jannie Schmitz] and [http://www.daandehaandesign.nl| Daan de Haan], who were the first to experiment with this relatively new technique, to answer some questions. And trying to convince the company [http://www.canon.nl| Océ] that I should be the next person to experiment with the printer as I want to try it on different materials.
 +
In the meantime I will be experimenting myself in the FabLab to see how 3D printing small layers on metal will turn out and some lasercutting.

Revision as of 18:34, 18 September 2014

Ilja Sofia

ILJA SOFIA VAN VLAARDINGEN
24 | ROTTERDAM
PORTFOLIO

zxk56e.jpg

Fantastic Forgeries

Jac. Jongert, Storage tin for 'Van Nelle coffee and tea', 1930. Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, Rotterdam

Jac. Jongert, Storage tin for 'Van Nelle coffee and tea', 1930. Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, Rotterdam

PHOTOS.jpg

Research

The artist

Jacob Jongert

Jacob Jongert 1883 — 1942 was a Dutch graphic designer, illustrator and art teacher. He studied at the arts academy in Amsterdam and got his teaching degree in 1905. In the same period he assisted the artist Roland Holst with his monumental murals. He thought this to be the direction in arts that suited him best but he never really managed to master the exact right technique. He found a new inspiration in S.H. de Roos, a book designer and typographer who brought the Arts & Crafts ideas of William Morris[1] to the Netherlands. After experimenting with several printing techniques he discovered graphic design as his ideal art form. Nothing is more effective in reaching a large audience than the mass production of posters and packages. Jongert was also a very active member of the social democratic party which you could see in his work. Graphic design was a logical choice, as it has the largest distribution. Although in 1911 Roland Horst advised him to leave politics behind and concentrate on his profession. In the early 20s Kees van der Leeuwen hired Jongert to design products for Van Nelle such as packaging for coffee, tea and cigarettes. His work is characterised by a certain simplicity; the colours powerful, the shapes angular, yet his ornamental background notable. He was inspired by the modern German design he saw on the Werkbund exhibition in Koln. He is seen as one of the pioneers in graphic design as he was the first artist to be hired to design products for commercial purposes.

The era

Post WWI / Interbellum

Bauhaus.jpg

Bauhaus

Constructivism.jpg

Constructivism

Destijl.jpg

De Stijl

The object

  • Coffee tin
  • 1930
  • 37cm x 41,5cm x 28cm
  • Red, yellow, white, blue
  • Silk-screened
  • Bought in 1986 by Boijmans
  • Primary colours
  • Asymmetric composition
  • Modern
  • Sans-serif typeface

Typography

Tekst.png


Sans serif type, designed by Jacob Jongert, only for Van Nelle

Typo.png

Out-of-context mapping class

Why interesting

  • Impact first World War, De Stijl, Bauhaus, Constructivism
  • Beginning advertising, first artist to design products for commercial purposes
  • It's already a reproduction
  • Difference between the value of the product then and now (a gulden—750 euros)

Technique

  • Injection moulding
  • Bending
  • Folding
  • Glass
  • Laser cutting
  • Make out of one piece
  • Ceramics
  • 3d Printing

Context

  • Grandma's time capsule with cookies, knit works, cat hook(?) and a revolver.
  • Trading/slavery, transport, economy, unesco

Compagnon

  • A save
  • Cigarettes

Web

Some screenshots of websites.

Websites.png

Imperfections

One of the most interesting things about the object, in my opinion, is the difference between its value then and now. Why would people pay 750 euros for it in 2014 when it used to be a worthless tin, given freely to sellers in the 20's? I found out people love it because of its scratches and dents; its imperfections. I thought this to be a very interesting and unique approach for my replica.

I associate those imperfections with pixels.
imperfections ≠ pixels

When you zoom in on the object you can easily see the pixels and therefore a whole range of colours.
The design used to be loved because it only had three colours (yellow, red and blue) and now it has a lot more.

Pixels.png

The technique I thought to be perfect for showing the colour range and relief is 2.5d printing.

25dprinting.jpg

25dprint2.jpg

2.5D.jpg

I'm now busy trying to get the artists Jannie Schmitz and Daan de Haan, who were the first to experiment with this relatively new technique, to answer some questions. And trying to convince the company Océ that I should be the next person to experiment with the printer as I want to try it on different materials. In the meantime I will be experimenting myself in the FabLab to see how 3D printing small layers on metal will turn out and some lasercutting.