Difference between revisions of "UNRVL9-Project2"
EzraBabski (talk | contribs) |
EzraBabski (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
'''DISCORD!''' | '''DISCORD!''' | ||
− | + | <span style='font-size:17px;'> | |
[[File:screenshot-discord1.png|center|500px]] | [[File:screenshot-discord1.png|center|500px]] | ||
[[File:screenshot-discord2.jpg|500px]] | [[File:screenshot-discord2.jpg|500px]] | ||
Line 128: | Line 128: | ||
[[File:Screen-sketch1.jpg |550px]] | [[File:Screen-sketch1.jpg |550px]] | ||
[[File:Amrith-prototype.jpg|550px]] | [[File:Amrith-prototype.jpg|550px]] | ||
− | + | </span> | |
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 11:43, 16 October 2020
Group 2
Fluidity of Presence: Ways of Being Together in the Digital Age
Can we communicate the complex experience of presence and absence, nearness and distance that is a feature of embodied existence (in short, the spectrum of "being together") by designing hybrid analogue/digital technologies that eschew stale binaries of online/offline connection?
Digital presence takes many forms. Regardless of whether we are “plugged in,” our digital footprint manifests in the digital ecosystem as a constantly expanding network of traces, data artefacts, biometric residues and transaction histories. Viewed from this angle, the conventional, binary distinction between online/offline states ceases to make sense; indeed, given the extent of our current dependence on digital technology, almost all of us are always digitally present, if only in a hyperfragmented way. It is more accurate, therefore, to insist on the existence of a spectrum of "online" states.
|
Monday Oct 12
[...]
|
|
[...] |