User:LV/NOTES

David Gauntlett: ‘Making is Connecting’

Chapter 2: The meaning of making 1: Philosophies of craft

In this chapter we will talk about online craftsmanship (traditional and innovative). Creativity and craftsmanship have been separated in time, which is not needed according to Peter Dormer. Art has gotten a higher position than craftsmanship, but this is something you can change for yourself. Richard Sennet argues that thinking is also a great part of crafting; crafting is not only making, and you also put your identity in your work. Ellen Dissanayake accentuates the ‘Joie de vivre’, the fun of creating something out of nothing. According to Dormer the act of crafting has remained standing because of the joy you get from the understanding you get in the process. Crafting is a natural expression, vanuit je roots, without any annoying artcritic that have to ‘approve’ your work. William Morris and John Ruskin brought op the community in crafts, which is actually quite a recent development. Ruskin was born in 1819 while Morris was born in 1838, Ruskin was an artist, critic, thinker and writer. Ruskin was against industrialism and the exploiting capitalism (a conservative person). Though he was political nor left nor right, he just wanted to go back in time. He was a patron for an individual economy, (1 voor alle, alle voor 1). Also did he believe in happiness without money, the current society sucked at this and needed to change. His rigorous statements in his essays ‘Unto this Last’ shocked people. ‘The nature of Gothic’ written by Ruskin (also a revelation for Ruskin), got the attention from Morris. Morris was fascinated by the gothic style, because the creations embraced imperfection but were made with great though. According to Morris you should do what you can do in your own powers and do not fear failure, don’t try to create perfect things, this makes you inhumane. In his time he witnessed people getting turned in to slaves of the machine. Working at an assembly line in a factory was dreadful and not stimulating at all. Nowadays this critique is known by the name Marx, but Ruskin got there before him. Marx and Ruskin both feel the same way about the assembly line, it is inhuman, but Ruskin focuses on the fact that the creativity in making that is being taken from them. Often Ruskin was misinterpreted by his readers, because of their presuppositions. The worker and the thinker should not be separated; they should come together in the process of making. Marx came with a more realistic plan for a better eco-system and Ruskin’s solutions were found unrealistic. Individualistic expression is so vital, that when it gets buldozerd by a rational system the whole system sucks. In that though, Morris started a creative community where people could finally be individuals again. He had this fascination for the Mid-centuries, where everybody could be a creative individual. The though that one day it was different than now, better than now, gave him hope. Morris though that by practicing al kind of crafts he could understand this better. He started a company where people could put effort and time in their creations (like home decor and print). Eventually the elite could only afford his products, while this was not his original plan. Allen Lane did succeed in this concept (affordable luxury products), with the Penguin Books. By putting this crafted luxury product on the market Morris wanted to make a change in the industrialistic society. It was a way of showing that there was another way. Morris expressed his utopian vision through multiple channels and kept hoping. Theodor Adorno couldn’t believe that people could be so ridiculous to enjoy this industrialized culture. He plainly spoke that people were stupid, while Morris at least gave them hope and solutions. Morris witnessed the pollution by industrialisation and saw science not help where it could have. This makes him 140 years ahead of the current debates. Nowadays the WEB 2.0 is the place where Morris dreamed of. Morris gave us a push in the right direction and left it in our hands. Creating something gives hope of –rest, -achievement and –effort. Creating connects the body with the spirit. Some people can’t understand this because they are trapped in toiling (slaven) work. Rich people thin material shows wealth, but wealth is using/enjoying nature in the most respectful way. Wealth is also sharing knowledge; just like nowadays exists in the WEB 2.0. Arts can be good when combining craft&ideas, according to Morris, you can’t possibly do the one without the other. Nowadays ‘art’ seems to be only about status, in the past it was hard to climb to the top but now you can use the WEB for that. Morris would have been happy about the sharing options we have nowadays, like YouTube, not like the elite ArtReview magazine. A community is a combination of individuals, (just like in the WEB 2.0)

notes in class:
plato - allegory of the cave.
artes liberales/ artes mechanica.
art is vanuit context, craft is maken, maar kan ook samenkomen in 1 persoon.
in de renaissance ontstond er verschil tussen arts&crafts door academic opkomst (academie (van marsilio francino, schilderkunst bijv, perspectief).
beeldende kunst en craft gaan daar hun eigen wegen, als kunstenaar wou je je onder artes liberales voegen.
bij de impressionisten ontstaat er een dialoog van kunst tot kunst, duurt tot jaren 90, nu zitten we in creatieve industries waar we weer teruggaan als ambachtsman(design, mode, vormgeving). omdat het geld oplevert, frictie tussen het kunstenaarscchap en de elite daarin, maar elite bestaat toch ook in de craftsman?
WDKA was eerst artis mechanica, bouwkunde, minder toegepaste kunsten, daarna volksindustrie academie, daarna academie beeldende kunst&technische wetenschappen, daarna academie van beeldende kunsten, nu meer applied arts.
afgelopen eeuw, vooral na duchamp, heel veel idee gerelateerde kunst, dat verandert nu, je zou jezelf het best research artist kunnen noemen eigenlijk.
Ruskin: een romaticus, tegen industrie.
de romantiek: back to nature, 19e eeuw, interesse in nationale geschiedenis. ruskin: ze ouders waren rijk (de oude rijken), die van morris ook, strijd tussen oud & nieuw geld.
vrije markt idee.
Adam Smith: puur geest zijn, eigen belang, 1 voor alle, alle voor 1 = goed systeem.
die vergelijking met youtube is te bevragen, is dat het ideaalbeeld? iets te positief misschien, je bent toch nog afhankelijk van de massa om bekend te worden hier.
goede vergelijking met morris zijn werk is biologisch eten, leuk idee, maar duur. Ruskin zegt dat iedereen moet eten en morris zegt 'alleen dit eten ookal kunnen dan alleen de rijken het krijgen'.
Adorno in contrast met morris & Benjamin, adorno is pessimistisch over die hoop van Morris (de populaire cultuur vindt het wel best zo, lekker beeldbuizen heel de dag).
Richard Sennet: een van de nieuwste twists tussen arts&crafts.
Laissez-faires economie: hoogtepunt in de 19e eeuw, let it go, de ultieme vrije markt, zonder regels en iedereen ze gang kan gaan, eigen succes brengt je verder, doe je niks = je eigen schuld, maar werkt dat? mensen worden dan onderbetaald.
Marx was een econoom en inspiratiebron voor het communisme, Marx&Ruskin krietiek op industriele gebeuren, marx gaat het meer om eigenaarschap van het werk, dus iets vanuit jezelf doen of verteld worden om iets te doen, oplossing: fabriek moet van de werkers worden ipv de eigenaar, dit was een Russische revolutie maar dat ging helemaal mis.
Marx ook interessant voor: hegemonie (dominant systeem waardoor je als werker niet hogerop in een bedrijf behoort, klassenbewustzijn: bewustwording van je klassen, vakbonden.

Chapter 3: The meaning of making 2: Craft Today

In this chapter we’ll talk about how the ideas of Ruskin&Morris turned into the nowadays known DIY culture and the philosophy, and then extract a new definition of creativity. In the 18th century the meaning of the word ‘craft’ was ‘a political, sly approach’, in the last quarter of the 19th century the word ‘craft’ as we now know raised. Craft has a web of elements: decorative (being excluded from fine arts), vernacular (natural, community, everyday), politics of work (expression through objects). The combination of the 3 made the Arts&cCrafts movement, a group of people built on the ideas of Ruskin&Morris, where all work was equal and had individual expressions close to self. Arts&Crafts starts in 1887 and ends with the WW1, it is connected to romantism, individualism, community and self-reliance (America), and was according to Greenhalg the perfect combination. It is similar to the contemporary crafts and the WEB 2.0, with a practical, positive and ethical message creating physical and mental freedom. The dehumazing industrialism got rejected and resulted in expensive crafted products, which then got rejected by the Americans with the DIY culture. Gustav Stickley started a magazine (in America) about Ruskin&Morisses philosophy and posted his own chair design for people to build and by doing that, started the phenomena ‘open source’. This democratic approach fits the ideals of the Arts&Crafts movement (craft=more important than design), DIY is the Americanised Arts&Crafts message. Today DIY is associated with everyday home improvements, nothing political about that (<?). DIY emerged in the 1960’s in a counterculture, which believes (according to Alan Watts) that our education system gives to much abstract info and teaches not the fundamental things in life. This was said during a scientific congress accompanying a LSD fanatic (Leary), a beat poet (Ginsberg) and a poet/environmentalist (Snyder), not the typical people. This attitude against the educationsystem came from Jon Holt, he argues that learning became machine, which does not work, and then home schooling (DIY) emerged, where children could develop their own interest. Also important” Stewart Brand and his book (The Whole Earth Catalog) full of resources to DIY (gardening, building etc.) Brand uses the phrase ‘whole earth’ because of the picture that came from NASA for the first time, raising consciousness about limited resources. His catalog supports self-education and later in his life he became a pioneer of the home computing community. His work lets us connect Morrisses Arts&Crafts movement with the counter culture DIY movement. Similar but different, the lo-fi culture (influenced by punk) that rejects the popular mainstream and produces things that are less bothered with physical beauty. Amy spencer loves that people go against the grain and make alternatives, even if it sells or not. According to Spencer the online world will never beat real objects, but it has eased her life. It is nice to be able to swap real objects but producing so much is bad for the environment. Spencer likes zines because they are not for the money and show that you don’t have to accept the given culture. Important: The Riot Girl, a zine that established a ‘third wave’ in feminism, that created replacements instead of complains. This third wave feminism created zines with parodies and serious matters, later even mama zines. Betsy Greer (craftivism) argues that you can buy anything, but also could make the political choice to make&exchange yourself, that gives some crafts (knitting) a revolutionary side. People pay people to do stuff for them = bad, disempowering. Doing it yourself is good for the self-esteem. This theory may not be realistic to put in action, but it is true. According to John Naish we can’t find happiness in the things we already got but keep wanting more, this is relating to evolution and gathering stuff for survival. Even though we know about the environmental issues we keep buying new things instead of reusing. Crafting can help us with this problem, re-use stuff and connect with each other, make an effort to reprogram ourselves. This can also be done in the media, by people who make armature films and stuff that brings us pleasure and connectedness, because everybody can do it. For Anthony McCann crafting holds a mental/social level (crafting gentleness), and that by crafting you gain new values to make a difference in your own helpfulness and consequences. The gentle crafting spirit can become a part of all interaction in human&nature, to become more aware (of making a difference). We make our own experiences and shape our material surroundings, an idea that also arises in the ‘Slow Movement’. Carl Honre brought this to a bigger audience, he argues that we cram too much in one day and then can’t gain enough pleasure and knowledge from what we do, when we would do slow work we would increase the quality of the experiences. When you not only consume but also make, you will appreciate the everyday things more. During the WW2 crafting was strong, after that period people were pleased with the massive manufactured goods, starting this century homemade goods raised in respect because of the environmental problems. Some people experience crafting and making as a new thing (Faythe Levine) when instead this idea is over 100 years old. The book ‘Hand made nation’ documented this movement and the WEB made it possible to spread fast around the world. Important: Etsy. According to Garth Johnson the internet holds the craft world together. The Internet is a place where crafters can show their real-world objects and connect with others. Amy Carlton & Cinnamon Cooper (DIY trunkshow) wrote a craftifesto; Craft is: powerfull,personal,political and possible. Craft became more than just making, it’s also about community, the book&film ‘Hand Made Nation’ and the magazine ‘Make’ are nowadays spreaders of the DIY culture. According to knitter Sabrina Gschwandtner the rise of crafting came from the rejection of the hyperfast culture, digital technology and consumerism, people like to create something from start till end. Matthew Crawford: Working with your hands is satisfying. Deb Dormody: bookbinding is authentic and gives a personal touch. Christy Petterson: does whatever she wants. Alena Hennesy: art is boring; the craft community is wonderful network. Jenny Hart: craft is relaxing and has room for experimenting. These were all person satisfactions with crafting. In the craftworld (unlike the artworld) fame is unimportant, Amanda Soule wrote a book about crafting with family, where your products don’t spread amongst the world. Crafting can make a family bond through creativity, being creative together, parent and children painting both brings learning and bonding. Soule also highlights creative living is helpful for community’s, like making blankets for homeless people. There are a lot of different kinds of craft activities but what connects them all is the process. Rozsika Parkes argues that embroidery is both before and against feminism and that the embroider can see a positive reflection of herself in her work. Joanne Tuney argues that knitting offers confidence and is not about the endresult but about the making and creating. Marybeth Stalp found out that the family members of quilters don’t understand how quilter can put so much time in the work and that they only care about the amount of finished works. Richard Reynold finds guerrilla gardening equal, not seeking for recognition but unselflesly making the world a nicer place, with this anonymous interventions. The writer of this book found out that the definition of creativity was to easy to make during his classes so he started showing random images and asked why or why not they would be creative. Concluding: creativity is handmade, something new or redesigned. He compared 2 Star Wars posters, 1 original and 1 with added computer aliens. The original was creative and the second one wasn’t because it didn’t add something to the emotional experience (but it still has work in it). The computer animations seem to lack the ‘handmade’ but are created in a time-consuming process. Although unfair, we find it difficult to relate toe the handmade feel in this wizardry. Craftwork should be humane and create an emotion engagement. Another example that defines creativity is the individual remaking of 15 sec of the film and than stitching it all together. Although it can’t be creative because it is a derivative work, but people put in a creative effort. According to Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, JESUS CHRIST, and other, the definition of creativity= things or ideas that haven’t been seen before. But this is weird because than you would have to know everything that was ever made. According to JESUS CHRIST creativity should be noticed by influential people in the field. Creativity is not an experience or a process, it just relies on begin at the right place at the right time and getting acknowledged by experts. Also he argues that the concept of ‘Flow’ (working and forgetting the world around you) is seen in all the highly creative people but is not exclusive to them (tegenstrijdigggg). The writer doesn’t agree with this high-powered creativity and believes that all ordinary people can be creative, even with fixing your car. DEFENITION OF CREATIVE: making something original, arouse emotions, output shows a personal presence. The presence of the maker in the outcome allows people to mirror and recognise personal feelings. Perhaps, not so sure, but something can’t be creative when the maker did not had any joy at making it. This joy doesn’t need to be all the time, but somewhere in the process at least. This definition of creativity is not a personal one (of the writer) but a combination of comparisments. The creativity as we use it in everyday life is outlined by the writer. Although the word creativity is overused, the definition he gives seems to work pretty well in practice. Star wars special edition is less creative than armature youtubers, because the WANT to do it and that needs to be felt.

notes in class: Craft gaat over materiaal, fine art over concept.
door met je handen te werken uit je expressie, dit heb je niet met machines.
Craft is voor de elite, kun je het niet betalen? Dan maak je het maar zelf.
Morris: hoge kwaliteit producten zorgt ook voor betere kwaliteit van het leven.
Alan watts: boeddhisme naar europa gebracht.
DIY: zelf onderzoek naar hoe iets moet/maken.
PUNK DIY: tegen massa productie, kleine organisaties die zelf media maakt, anti elitair, tegenbeweging tegen de maatschappij van die tijd.

Chapter 4: The Meaning of Making 3: DIGITAL

Producing something for the WEB is seen as ‘unreal’, because it is virtual, untouchable. In the eyes of the writer it is real, like perhaps handcoding, it is a process. Although you can’t craft a material, you can leave your fingerprints in a digital work also. Nowadays it keeps getting easier to do for everyone but you are still tinkering (knutselen), you create something from nothing. The WEB is huuuuge, there are all kinds of creative things in there, from photography to protests, there is too much to see. A good example is YouTube, started in 2005 and grew fast, nowadays serving 1 billion videos every day. At first the writer though that YouTube was just another television platform, but he was mostly wrong. Although it is not really an open source it is a place where people can share and react (community). The quality of the videos is not important; the professional Chris Anderson uploaded a homemade video of low quality. The focus in these videos lies in the context, that anyone can do this. This is the same as what Ruskin said, that things made by people should bear the marks of the effort. According to Ruskin you should take the work of people for what it is, and recognize the best quality, whether this is the execution or the expression. You should always look at the idea first and then find a fitting execution within your own limits. This shows in the video of Chris Anderson and lets us know that any rough and untaught person could do this. Inspired by this, the writer started making YouTube videos for himself, homemade videos of his son and professional academic videos (academic most views). A YouTube video is a new category video, a short, fast and online video. The WEB applications that encourage sharing are broad platforms, the most established is YouTube. Apart from the fact that uploading on YouTube takes some preparation, it is an archetypal (geïdealiseerd oermodel dat ten grondslag ligt aan latere varianten) digital creative platform in three key ways: 1. FRAMEWORK FOR PARTICIPATION: It offers a framework for anticipation, short videos that can contain (almost) anything you like. Without the ability to communicate in there, it would be nothing. Contrary to that, Mark Andrejevic thinks that YouTube uses the unpaid video-makers for valuable marketing data with commercial purposes. Virginia Nightingale argues that this trade-off between free use of a creative platform and providing useful data is not perfect but all right. 2. AGNOSTIC ABOUT CONTENT: It is up to the users (how) to use YouTube for innovation or not. Some users use it to gain a broad audience, some don’t. As measured in 2007, over 50% of the videos on YouTube are original user-created videos, and show creativity. The makers wish to communicate, entertain, share knowledge and show off. 3. FOSTERING COMMUNITY: YouTube does not only encourage creating a self-exhibition but also encourages connecting with other users (rating, commenting). By simply being community participants you can become a video celebrity, or like Oprah, create a one-way conversation YouTube channel and fail. Henry Jenkins claims that users get emotional support through this community and more aware of their own culture. There is also a gift-giving dimension, the fact that people give and receive video gifts with no economic value. Although the majority of YouTube visitors are viewers, there are millions of users engaging. Some people make and share stuff online because the amount of effort is low (Facebook) and you still get to be part of a community. Flickr is similar to Facebook in some way, showing off to friends and family. Leisa Reichelt argues that sharing everyday personal stuff is ‘ambient intimacy’, because normally time and space make this sharing impossible. Some people find all this information annoying noise, and for some people it is a resolution. Posting stuff online is mostly to feel more connected to people. Why do people put more effort in sharing other things online, like blogging, without getting paid for it? David Jennings is not a holiday blogger, he writes about one of his acquired music records per day. He felt like he didn’t appreciate all the records he had bought. He writes about his personal connection to the records. He does this for himself, he is passionate about this, and it’s harder to give up when it’s public. A personal endeavour that is also connecting him to other people. Amanda Blake Soule (creative-family) sees blogging as a way to remind herself of the joys of parenting. She also wishes to inspire other parents, which it does. When the writer askes why people post online the answer is not only connecting but also getting recognition, not so warm and kindly thus. Rosanna Guadagno and colleagues studied what kind of person bloggers are. The study found that people with ‘openness’ were more likely to be bloggers, and women that are ‘neurotic’. A Japanese study found that the biggest reason to blog is getting positive response from other people. Blogging creates a satisfaction from being accepted by others, more than writing a personal diary. Making and sharing online creates networks of emotional support and social bonds. David Brake wrote a PhD about personal bloggers and found that there are 5 reasons for blogging: narrowcasting, narrowdialoge, PR, telelogic and self-directive, none of them find this hard work. Nancy Baym and Robert Burnett studies fan-bloggers, and questions if this is exploitation. The bloggers don’t feel exploited and enjoy the connections and contributing. So blogging is about making, connecting and recognition. Just like hands on craft, bloggers like to manage a whole creation and sometimes share this. The motives for online and offline crafting are the same but Internet provides a sharing platform. The Internet makes it easier to share, share like we have always done. The Internet could also cause people to become insular, but this is not happening yet. There are many other Web 2.0 platforms that are not television-y, like Wikipedia, Flickr, Ravelry and Kiva. But there are also platforms that let you create a totally virtual world (Second Life) that could lead away from the hands-on creativity. The supporters think it is interactive, so not television-y, but to critics of television it is taking away our hands-on life. The writer thinks this is not a development, using your body to control a virtual body. Thankfully it has not become the future, and as Dougald Hine argues that being social wins from high-tech. The Web also lets people do more inventive and off-screen activity’s, like the television show Why Don’t You? Hine is one of the founders of ‘School of Everything’ where people can share and get free or paid knowledge. The Internet in the early days eased to do things we already did, but now starts to help do things we didn’t already do. Meetup.com lets people meet up locally, and the most active people there are stay at home mums. There are a lot of Websites that makes people meet online to get together offline, like: sharing land, borrow tools, exchange skills, skillshare, green gyms, connecting retired men. The web made these things easier to organise and brings people together. Making and sharing is rewarding, brings more happiness and well-being.

notes in class: DIY is niet echt een stroming.
het is meer een keuze, niet noodzakelijk.
het is wel een beetje een stroming.
niet zoals bij arts&crafts dat er productstramienen zijn.
hoe ze over youtube praten in dit boek is nu een beetje naief.
hoe hippies dachten over technologie streeft voort in nu, net als rechtspartijtig.
de VS WW2 gewonnen, gigantische industrie neergezet, die bleef gebruikt.
american beauty idee (film:its a wonderfull world).
grootste aandrijver van die industrie is Military industrial complex, Eisenhower.
the american university - hollerith.
stroming: nieuwlinks, gaat confrontatie aan, antiwar, studentprotest, aanhangers marx.
the new communalists: zenbeleving, open your mind, ruskin aanhangers, communes bouwen, terugtrekken uit maatschappij.
cybernetics. informatiesysteem, zou alles in uitgedrukt kunnen worden, actie reactie, computersolving.
docu: all watched over by machines of loving grace.
buckminster fuller (architect), aarde als ruimteschip, cirkels nabootsen in architectuur, koepels, inspiratiebron voor hippies (drop city).
neem de technologie zoals die is en zet het naar je eigen hand.
antoine bruy fotografeert communes.
steward brand- whole earth catalog, gids, communes samenbrengen, essays, reclames en opensource (tot jaren 80 gelopen).
toen dit overging ontstond er nieuw netwerk, kruisbestuiving, the WELL(brand).
1993: Wired, tijdschrift, steward brand, nieuwe plek waar commune digitaal werd. diehippies kwamen uiteindelijk in t world economic forum.
nieuwrechts: ronald regan, jaren 80, new economy, werknemers werden ondernemers (bedrijfhoppen), dit werd mogelijk gemaakt door internet.
why are artists poor - hans abbing.

HOW I FEEL ABOUT THIS

It certainly has taught me new stuff but I think this book is very lengthy. The writer is constantly repeating his information, even through chapters. It opened my eyes on the beauty of making but I feel it is served on a silver plate a bit too much. At the moment I am at this breaking point with my own art practise, because I have been doing all sorts of projects, not really matching together. I am trying to find thing, what I like the most, and it is starting to look like I don’t care about thinking all the time but just about making. Experimenting with materials and letting myself get surprised by the outcomes gives me the most joy of all. Creating things that are just nice to look at you know. So these chapters certainly helped me, and pushed me in this direction. But now about the content of the chapters; Art has a higher position that craftsmanship in the eyes of some. Me, as an artist, wander about these things often. But you can choose to put yourself on a pedestal and make art higher than craftsmanship, or not to. I think art is craftsmanship, and craftsmanship is art. When you make conceptual art you are also creating something, maybe not with materials but with thoughts, you are both. And when you are making art out of concept and executing it in material, you are both. But the difference is when somebody calls it art, you can make a beautiful carved table and call it craftsmanship, or you can put it in a gallery under the name of an artist and call it art. And that is a decision you make by yourself. But I don’t think art is bad in general, some people make it look prestigious and bad, but it is also a way to make money for some people. You can make art for yourself or for other people to ‘approve’ it. The ideas of Morris did not execute in the right way after all but at least he tried to do something about it. I totally agree that assembly lines and industrialism takes away all creativity in humans, but it was also necessary to happen, to be able to provide for this growing population. I like the fact that Morris decided to create a community where people could be individuals again and enjoy the craftsmanship again, but to sell it at such high prices that only the elite could afford is was kind of a fail. Material doesn’t show wealth, wealth is enjoying your life without these materials. I also agree that the WEB has created a place to: share your work, help or ask for help, feel not alone anymore blabla. It makes getting recognition for your work and climbing to the top easier, though you still have to rely on the mass. He uses YouTube as the ideal solution to Morris his problems, but nowadays YouTube is very different I think. It has turned into a machine to make money and is run by advertising shit. Like almost everything, free to begin with and fun, and when there are enough people using it they see money in it. It is a great place for open source though; you can find any DIY thing in there. Another fact I totally agree on is the schooling systems and how much they suck. Home-schooling is a much better solution if you’re up to it. Children are being forced to learn the same things they might not even care about or will never use again in their lives. Everybody needs to be moulded into the same person, when you would let them chose their own interest and let them develop that there would be much more progress. To me, being creative can be: solving problems, making something original. Not so sure about the ability to arouse emotions and creativity, I think that is a different knowledge. When I started woodcarving myself, I found out the joy of creating something on your own. Especially when it works out, because woodcarving by hand is a fucking pain in the ass. I do not have the patience for that, but in the same time I want to master it and finish my spoon, it is slightly addictive to me. MUST CARVE SPOON…

Take a look at my Tumblr page where i collect examples of carving:
password is: lisavermeer-finearts