Difference between revisions of "DigitalCraftMinor2015"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | == Minor | + | == Minor Daily Planning == |
'''MONDAY''' | '''MONDAY''' | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* WORK! | * WORK! | ||
| − | == | + | ==Fantastic Forgeries Mentoring/Tutorial Sessions == |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
Revision as of 12:19, 15 September 2015
Minor Daily Planning
MONDAY
- WORK!
TUESDAY
- WORK!
WEDNESDAY
- WORK!
THURSDAY
- WORK!
FRIDAY
- WORK!
Fantastic Forgeries Mentoring/Tutorial Sessions
| Date & Time | Classes | TODO |
|---|---|---|
| Sept 15 | Tools & Tech / Fantastic Forgeries Project Launch | |
| Sept 22 | Tools & Tech (morning)/ Practice & Research (afternoon) | |
| Sept 29 | Tools & Tech / Practice | |
| Oct 02 | Research (morning) | |
| Oct 06 | Tools & Tech / Practice | Studio-Practice – Tools & Tech Tutorials – Practice & Research Mentoring |
| Oct 08 | Research (morning) | |
| Oct 13 | Tools & Tech / Practice / Research | |
| Oct 27 | Tools & Tech | |
| Oct 30 | Museum of Fantastic Forgeries (Final Presentation) | |
| Oct 31 | Open Day Exhibition |
Evaluation
Your Fantastic Forgeries presentation is your first integrated assessment with you will receive a final mark Research and Practice(&Tools&Tech) . You will have 6 minutes to present, with 6 minutes of questions. 2 of your 6 minutes are dedicated towards the context of your chosen artefact.
In your presentation you are required to:
Critically reflect on your process, pointing to the knowledge and skills learned;
Connect your projects to practices of both craft and technology;
Frame your research and practice based results within the context of the assignment;
Defend the relevance and potential of your research and practice based results.
Deliverables:
Q13
1. A copy of your chosen artefact from the Boijmans collection using digital fabrication technologies;
2. A well-fabricated contemporary transformation(s) based on your chosen object of the Boijmans collection;
3. Polished project wiki page
4. Context visualisations
6. Exhibition Presentation
Evaluation Criteria:
1.The student is knowledgeable of the historical context of their project's themes, and has positioned/critically reflected upon new contexts in relation to the minor (i.e. craft, fabrication, authorship, appropriation, experimentation and relation to personal practice/signature).
2. The student has defined a clear, profound, and independent method of research, which is visible in the design/artistic process.
3. The student has a rigorous approach to experimentation, which is visually presented as a coherent process.
4. The student has conceptualised and executed high-level, innovative, and original works.
5. The student has taken advantage of the technical instruction and technologies/tools offered, and has demonstrated a willingness to push their skills further.
6. The student has a motivated choice and proper defence for a specific a technology in their execution of their final assignment.
