Difference between revisions of "UNRVL9-Project2"
EzraBabski (talk | contribs) |
EzraBabski (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 123: | Line 123: | ||
[[File:Marit-notes3.jpg |350px]] | [[File:Marit-notes3.jpg |350px]] | ||
[[File:arimit-screenshot.png|center|200px]] | [[File:arimit-screenshot.png|center|200px]] | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <span style='font-size:20px;'> | ||
+ | '''SKETCHING!''' | ||
+ | <center> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <br/>[[File:|550px]] | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | [[File: |550px]] | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | [[File:|550px]] | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
<br/> | <br/> |
Revision as of 13:15, 16 October 2020
Group 2
Fluidity of Presence: Ways of Being Together in the Digital Age
Can we communicate the complex experience of presence and absence, nearness and distance that is a feature of embodied existence (in short, the spectrum of "being together") by designing hybrid analogue/digital technologies that eschew stale binaries of online/offline connection?
Digital presence takes many forms. Regardless of whether we are “plugged in,” our digital footprint manifests in the digital ecosystem as a constantly expanding network of traces, data artefacts, biometric residues and transaction histories. Viewed from this angle, the conventional, binary distinction between online/offline states ceases to make sense; indeed, given the extent of our current dependence on digital technology, almost all of us are always digitally present, if only in a hyperfragmented way. It is more accurate, therefore, to insist on the existence of a spectrum of "online" states.
|
Monday Oct 12
[...]
|
DISCORD!
|