User:Anna.saaltink

Museum of fantastic forgeries

Mon Premier Amour - 1952 - Man Ray - 220 x 200 cm - Oil on canvas

When I first saw this painting I thought wooowww this is huge. I like the colorful composition, geometrical abstraction and the layering of the shapes. After I saw the titel and that it was a painting by Man Ray. I was surprised because I only knew him as a photographer. This made me curious and I started doing research about the painting but I couldn't find a lot of information on internet. Google popped up three pictures what I thought was odd and interesting at the same time. When I continued researching I found out that there was one more painting that was also called 'Mon premier amour'. What did this mean? two first loves? Thats not possible or is it? The tittle you can interpretative in more ways; this painting was a abstract translation of his first love (a woman) or this painting was his first or this painting was his favorite or painting in general was his favorite? It gave me a lot of questions and made me more curious. I wanted to know more about this mysterious not very known painting.

Research about Mon premier amour and Man Ray

In books, on websites, and after watching a documentary I found a little bit more information about the painting. In all the books and sites I have seen there was little written about this painting and it all said the same thing: Mon Premier Amour' is one of the larger paintings by Man Ray from the early 'fifties. In addition, it is also a rare example of geometric abstraction in the work of this artist. The model for the painting is inspired by collages of coloured paper and airbrush paintings. He used the latter technique mainly in the period between 1917 and 1920. The title of the work, which translates as 'My first love', is probably a reference to this technique, which he used early in his career.

Study before creating Mon premier amour 1952

Man Ray - Emmanuel Radnitzky - American painter, photographer, filmmaker, object artist - 1890 Philadelphia - 1976 Paris. Man Ray was one of the most productive, innovative (dada and surrealistic) artist, who could never decide on which of his many talents he would focus. Photographer Stieglitz and the Amory show of 1913 in New York let Man Ray decide he wanted to devoted his life to make art. In 1913 he had his first exhibition and became friends with Marcel Duchamp. In 1917 Man Ray started to make experimental painting with a new technique he developed: the airbrush technique. He started as a painting influenced by cubism and the collage technique. He is trying to give the dadaism a place in America but people there did not understand it. He moves in 1921 to Paris where he gets a lot of dadaist and surrealistic friends. He starts to make pictures because he wanted to photograph his own work. He got famous with his portrait and fashion photography and a lot of years he still got known only by his photography. In 1922 he invents the rayografy (named after him), with that you put objects directly on photo paper and light it. You didn't use a camera or had negatives. I think these rayografys also look as collages and have layers just like the painting. In 1925 he gets into the surrealistic movement and becomes her official photographer and restarts painting. His paintings are in that time surrealistic and sometimes a bit cubistic.

In 1940 he fled back to America and stops with commercial photography and returns to painting. After the WO2 he returns to Paris and concentrate only on painting and drawing. He re-took the interest of making collages, using old techniques and materials he mainly used in 1917.

Oil paintings inspired on collages 1917

Example of his developed airbrush technique 1917

Example of Rayography 1922

He was a avant-garde, modernist for his time. Nobody understood him or bought his work. His wife says in the documentary 'you have to die first before getting famous'. What turned out to be more then true. Also she says, I quote: 'painting was his first love and photography was for earning money'. What I found interesting and inspiring to see is that this man blurred boundaries between artistic disciplines. He used so many different medium. I didn't know when I picked this object he made this painting inspired on 1917-1920 colored paper collages and after I found his collage for 'mon premier amour' it reminded me a lot about the way I work. I choose this painting on my intuition, funny that it has this resemblance.

To found out more information about the painting, why it was in the museum and more of these questions I went back to the boijmans. They told me the painting was a gift from Man Ray's foundation in 1972. Before that they had a exhibition about his work in 1971.

Research cubism and abstract art

Also I decided to do research to abstracted art in general, and what influenced it. Like that I understand the painting more and that I can put it in time and context. Cubism was the art movement before abstracted art in 1907. It was the biggest influence art movement. Paul Cezanne was the precursor of cubism. He said that nature is built with primal shapes, like cubes, cones etc. But cubism really started with Picasso, he was the most important pioneer of cubism with the painting Les demoiselles d'Avignon. Characteristics of cubism are, confusing perspective, collage, reflection, construction, simplification, etc.

Les demoiselles d'Avignon - Picasso

Abstracted art is a movement in modern art starting in the begin of the 20th century (+-1910). Abstracted art was against the traditions of art schools with objective/ realistic view. They were against art where the reality is exactly pictured and through that is recognizable like a landscape painting. In an abstract artwork you can not recognize a visible reality but form, color, line and material can speak for themselves. Form, lines and color are more important with abstracted art then with other art movements. They say Kandinsky started the abstracted art with his aquarel in 1910. People saw abstracted art something without a meaning and knew it had to be appreciated for the beauty of form, line and color. Geometrical abstracted art is abstracted art with geometrical forms like a square, triangle, rectangle etc. There are closed forms without holes and openings.

De blauwe ridder - 1907 - Kandinsky

Abstraction to The new Aesthetic

I think Mon premier amour is off course a geometrical abstracted painting but also has a cubism influence. I think it is interesting that in that time people were against the objective realistic view paintings and I think it can be interesting to make a link with the art of today. The new Aestetic is an interesting new art movement where I can see some similarity. It is a contradiction in the same way realism is to abstract art. The new Aesthetic is a term introducted by James Bridle, what refers to the increasing appearance of visual language of digital technology and the internet in the physical world and blending of virtual and physical. It has been around some time and we see these new styles recur in our art, designs and products. The pixelation of low-resolution images, the rough yet distinct edges of 3D printing, the shifting layers of digital maps.

Lecture James Bridle: http://booktwo.org/notebook/waving-at-machines/

'Why do we enjoy 8-bit, glitch, and other technological imagery revealing the seams of its construction? "For a while now, I’ve been collecting images and things that seem to approach a new aesthetic of the future, which sounds more portentous than I mean. What I mean is that we’ve got frustrated with the NASA extropianism space-future, the failure of jetpacks, and we need to see the technologies we actually have with a new wonder." says James Bridle about his tumblr, The New Aesthetic. "It’s an aesthetic born of the grain of seeing/computation... the viewpoint of that other next nature, the robot-readable world," comments Matt Jones at BERG.'

Source: http://rhizome.org/editorial/2011/jun/2/new-aesthetic/

After reading this I had some questions, How do you get glitch? What is a glitch?

'A glitch is a short-lived fault in a system. It is often used to describe a transient fault that corrects itself, and is therefore difficult to troubleshoot. The term is particularly common in the computing and electronics industries, and in circuit bending, as well as among players of video games, although it is applied to all types of systems including human organizations and nature. The term derives from the German glitschig, means 'slippery', possibly entering English through the Yiddish term glitch.'

A computer glitch is the failure of a system, usually containing a computing device, to complete its functions or to perform them properly. In public declarations, glitch is used to suggest a minor fault which will soon be rectified and is therefore used as a euphemism for a bug, which is a factual statement that a programming fault is to blame for a system failure. It frequently refers to an error which is not detected at the time it occurs but shows up later in data errors or incorrect human decisions. While the fault is usually attributed to the computer hardware, this is often not the case since hardware failures rarely go undetected. Situations which are frequently called computer glitches are: Incorrectly written software (software bug), Incorrect instructions given by the operator (operator error),Undetected invalid input data (this might also be considered a software bug), Undetected communications errors, Computer virus, Computer exploiting (sometimes called "hacking")

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glitch

What makes good glitch art good is that, amidst a seemingly endless flood of images, it maintains a sense of the wilderness within the computer. " — Hugh S. Manon and Daniel Temkin, “Notes on Glitch”

Similar images - influenced - rip offs - look a likes and more

The replica

First I thought to make my copy out of glass and led but 190 by 220 cm will be to big and heavy. Also I wanted to still have the idea of the layers over each other. I thought about make the idea of a big kite but I wanted to do something more digital and 3D.

Then I got the idea to make the painting as a 3D mobile. First calculate all the shapes in real size (angles, length, width) measurements. Draw them all separately in a 3D program like sketch up or tinker cad. I think about make the shapes all 2,5 cm deep, the same as the painting is deep. After drawing them in the 3D program make them in the program pepakura as a paper fold construction. Laser cut the fold construction in real size cardboard/paper. I want to paint the shapes the same color as the painting, mix the paint to the color myself. In the end I want to hang all the shapes from the sealing before/behind each other like that you create the layering/collage like in the painting. If you look from the front is looks like the 2D painting but if you move a little it a 3D construction.

Lenghts & widths + Layering order

Angles + 19 shapes from the painting drawn in 3D program, tinker cat

After drawing the shapes in the 3D program I put them in the papekura but the size of the shapes were to big for the program even if i scaled them down. I thought also it would be a learning experience for me to make it myself without the program. I am not good with using illustrator or with perspective drawings so I choose to draw all the shapes with illustrator. After I did one shape I went to the laser cut station and did a test with white paper. I learned how the machine works, only my perspective drawing was not right, as you can see on the picture. I did research how I could draw it correctly and corrected my first shape.

My first laser cut test shape + one of the 19 shapes drawn correctly in illustrator reduced to 40% of the orginial so it could fit in the lasercut

Now I laser cut and folded 18 of the 19 shapes (last one went wrong so I am doing it again today). I did not put the back yet because i have to make a hanging system from the inside. I thought about my idea to paint the shapes in the same color as in the painting but Tim told me it would be the same medium as it was used, So I thought about projecting the painting on my white 3D shapes, to get the right color. It will be a challenge to hang them but also to hang them so precise it will be the same as the projected painting. I will see in the end if I did everything correctly.

I changed my idea of hanging the shapes from the sealing. Instead I am hanging them at the wall, all connecting to each other. The colors I will project with a beamer but because my replica is 3D I have to make sure the projecting will be correct. I am thinking about taking a picture from the top of my composition and color shapes of the picture as they should be, like that I create perspective in my projection.

Experimenting with the composition of the shapes

In illustrator I tried to get the color of the shapes for the projection but I was not happy with the result because the color is not the same and without the paint it gives a whole different structure. So In photoshop I worked more on it.

After trying to project the shapes I drew in illustrator with the beamer I realized it was not working.. The beamer was on the same hight and distance as the camera but still it was not projection it fully. I started to read on the internet why it was not working and I read that it was impossible to get it the same because of the different lens of the camera and the beamer.

I watched tutorials what I could to do fix it and downloaded software as: mad mapping and resolume arena but this was to complicated for me as a beginner and with the time we had left. On youtube I found a more easy way of doing it only the problem with this was that you can only do it when you have the place were you will have to show it because ones you move the beamer or the object it will mess up the projection. So I prepared myself testing it. But for the presentation to show it at school I will have to do it before the presentation.

This is the youtube movie I found to do my video mapping: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvvy86zvoX4

Maybe this will be not a good idea because it will be stresfull before the presentation. Also the colors of the beamer where not very nice but maybe if you have a better beamer the colors will be better. Still I wanted to try something else. So I bought a second hand overhead projector to do more experiments with color.

The replica transformation

For my transformed replica I want to work with the new aesthetic as inspiration. The now a days movement: the new aesthetic I linked to abstract art from the 20 century in my research as you can read above. I want to take away more information like the abstract painters did with their art. I want to make a abstraction of an abstraction.

Tests made in photoshop

During my research about the new aesthetic I read a lot about glitching in electronics and this interested me a lot. I wanted to get to know how you can make a glitch. A glitch I see as an abstraction. I like glitched images because they all glitched images are unique. I want to make glitching images of the painting first. Maybe combined the glitching with the digitally weaving?

A couple of my many glitches of Mon premier amour I did in text edit

Also I found a software program that can glitch your photo. I found this software on this page: http://www.stitch-n-glitch.com/.

After passing by the textile workshop place they told me they did not have a digital weaving machine. I asked them which machines where digitally and that were embroidery or the knitting machine. I never worked on a knitting machine so why not do that? She told me it would be hard to learn in a short time especially because I want to something different with codes and glitching but I am very curious what I can achieve. I want to use the image of mon premier amour that I glitched on the computer but also glitch while I am knitting so I have a already made glitch and a spontaneous one. I made in photoshop a 4 x 4 pixel file with my glitched image for the knitting machine. When I came to the textile workshop they told me I had to do it in only 2 colors. I still tried to make a pattern out of it but it got really abstract, you couldn't even recognize the painting. Also I made some glitches in the process and I like the first result of it.

You can only knit with two colors in school but here I used dubble threat so you see can see four colors

Next to experimenting with the knitting machine I read more about glitching with fabrics and knitting on the internet to see what others where doing. I didnt expect that I could find that much about it.

http://www.theverge.com/2012/8/10/3232746/glitch-art-textiles-phillip-stearns

http://glitchknit.jp

http://yearoftheglitch.tumblr.com

http://xxxclairewilliamsxxx.wordpress.com/glitched-textile/

Next experimentation I will try to make several glitched images in only black in white so I get more a pattern as the one above. I tried it in black and white and the negative one. Curious what I will look like knitted. Also I will try to do experiments with embroidery.

Make from the museum

Day one

Tuesday 2nd of September As a group we decided we wanted to create a 3D object. After looking at the Boijmans collection we chose a rubber vase and we wanted to scan this with the 123 catch app. This did not work with our object because of the reflection, transparent surfaces and blurry photo's. Most objects were not easy to reach because there were behind glass so we chose a other method and an other object. We chose the picknick set of Jean Pierre Vitrac (1977). We wanted to keep the function and the idea of the set but in a different implementation. We wanted to put together our picknick set with different plates and cutlery we found in shops or at home then make pictures of it and make a good 3D scan with the 123 catch app. After a discussion with the teachers we realized, that we first need to have the data. I order to share it on the wiki page. That for we had to change our idea. We came up with the idea to trace over the photos with illustrator and then transform it into a 3D model in tinker cad.

Day two

Wednesday 3rd of September We decided to make different versions for the exhibition on thursday. One 3D print model, with the same color and form but in a smaller version because with the printer the exact dimensions were not possible at the WDKA. Secondly we make our own picknick set molt with multifunction cutlery (3 in 1) and a square plate. We wanted to make a more minimalistic form but keep the original snap off idea of the pick nick set of Vitrac. We chose to use the vacuum forming technique. That we are doing tomorrow (Thursday) at the Stadsfablab in Utrecht. We want to make a couple of this object in different colors. That could work in mass production.

Day three

Thursday 4th of September Hendrick finished the 3D drawing in tinkercad and started printing it. Meanwhile our own pick nick set had some troubles. The glue was not fully dry, what may be a problem for the vacuuming. Still Fabienne and I went to Utrecht. Ovethere they told us we could not use or fork/knife/spoon construction because it was was plastic and it would melt. We still wanted to try something so we continued with the plate. This also was not working as we thought. The PET plastic they used and gave us was melting and got to thin, also it was not vacuum the whole plate. They told us it was because of the shape of the plate and we would have dug a hole into the middle so it could vacuum better. Without the result we where hoping for we had to return back to Rotterdam.

Reflection

It was interesting to see how every group approached their project and with what techniques they worked. Hendrick did the digital and 3D-printing part of our project. It was nice to get already an idea of how the 3D software works. Seeing that you can build this in a program and get a read model out of the 3D printer is amazing. We maybe failed with producing the pick nick set with the vacuum forming but we had some nice experience going to the stadsfablab in Utrecht and we learned more about the vacuum technique and we saw what is kind of other machines they have for next time.