Difference between revisions of "User:Fuutsie"

From DigitalCraft_Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
{| role="presentation" class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
 
{| role="presentation" class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
| <strong>What is appropriation about for me?</strong>
+
| <strong>Appropriation, the early research</strong>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|The quickest explanation is repurposing an object/artpiece as is to give it another function or meaning. This can be as simple as turning a table upside down, but can also exist in the way of Pablo Picasso’s “Guitar, Sheet music and Wine glass, where existing pieces come together to form a new work. This way a NEW object is created.
 
|The quickest explanation is repurposing an object/artpiece as is to give it another function or meaning. This can be as simple as turning a table upside down, but can also exist in the way of Pablo Picasso’s “Guitar, Sheet music and Wine glass, where existing pieces come together to form a new work. This way a NEW object is created.
Line 18: Line 18:
 
Everything has to come from somewhere: Linking artists/designers interpretations throughout his life and combining this into a new piece. (David T. Ansted - The stone book of nature) This way everything made, copied or not should be interpreted as a new work. You can’t copy something that doesn’t exist. Take “Ceci n’est pas une pipe” of Ren’e Magritte. In the same way you could perfectly copy an artwork, but the function and meaning change: If you repaint/reproduce Victory Boogie Woogie from Mondriaan, it isn’t about Manhattan or the music on the streets, but more about Piet Mondriaan and the fame behind his name.  
 
Everything has to come from somewhere: Linking artists/designers interpretations throughout his life and combining this into a new piece. (David T. Ansted - The stone book of nature) This way everything made, copied or not should be interpreted as a new work. You can’t copy something that doesn’t exist. Take “Ceci n’est pas une pipe” of Ren’e Magritte. In the same way you could perfectly copy an artwork, but the function and meaning change: If you repaint/reproduce Victory Boogie Woogie from Mondriaan, it isn’t about Manhattan or the music on the streets, but more about Piet Mondriaan and the fame behind his name.  
  
Why do we not like being copied by other people?
 
  
 +
Some interesting questions I did not go on with for now:
  
Type of person that does it with intention of gaining profit.
+
Why do we not like being copied by other people?
The intention of copying
+
Does the intention of copying change the ethics of appropriation?
 +
Type of person that does it with intention of gaining profit?
  
Erkenning: Producent naar copycat gaat ipv de originele maker.
 
  
Dwdd dave hakkens
 
  
 
https://www.artspace.com/magazine/art_101/art_market/art_101_appropriation_art-5550
 
https://www.artspace.com/magazine/art_101/art_market/art_101_appropriation_art-5550
Give some artist using appropriation
+
 
  
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 19:55, 9 May 2018