Anna - Revision history

Anna: /* My future scenario */

2017-02-04T01:29:55Z

My future scenario

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:29, 4 February 2017
Line 45:		Line 45:

	=== My future scenario ===		=== My future scenario ===
	What if in 15 years communicating, sharing ideas, storytelling is going transform?		What if in 15 years communicating, sharing ideas, storytelling is going to transform?
	What if we won’t need words, sentences to communicate, only using non-verbal, visual language. Also the platforms gonna remain digital - sharing ideas, storytelling are purely based on platforms like Instagram, Twitter, Facebook.		What if we won’t need words, sentences to communicate, only using non-verbal, visual language. Also the platforms gonna remain digital - sharing ideas, storytelling are purely based on platforms like Instagram, Twitter, Facebook.
	As my project is based upon the idea of gathering culinary heritage from people/children and share it/ preserve it in a unique way.		As my project is based upon the idea of gathering culinary heritage from people/children and share it/ preserve it in a unique way.

Anna: /* My future scenario */

2017-02-04T01:27:38Z

My future scenario

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:27, 4 February 2017
Line 49:		Line 49:
	As my project is based upon the idea of gathering culinary heritage from people/children and share it/ preserve it in a unique way.		As my project is based upon the idea of gathering culinary heritage from people/children and share it/ preserve it in a unique way.
	What if we will have to use every single surface to communicate? even our tools will be communication devices.		What if we will have to use every single surface to communicate? even our tools will be communication devices.
	So in my project i suggest the idea of preserving the good, the bad, the weird, the horrible and even combination of these things. Using the kitchen tools as communication devices - the most important surface we have, are the kitchen textiles - towels, aprons.		So in my project i suggest the idea of preserving the good, the bad, the weird, the horrible and even combination of these things. Using the kitchen tools as communication devices - the most important surface we have, are the kitchen textiles - towels, aprons. The design is finished by its users, therefore it's open, every finished design is unique.
	I used this as an opportunity to share, preserve, reuse. Creating a method which can be a working method in the neighborhood. Storytelling and triggering creativity.		I used this as an opportunity to share, preserve, reuse. Creating a method which can be a working method in the neighborhood. Storytelling and triggering creativity.
	This can be easily created with the workshops of Bouwkeet - adults and kids also can easily learn how to create their own apron (without waste!) and after use it as a communicational platform. This also can be used as well in the workshops as well in the kitchen at home.		This can be easily created with the workshops of Bouwkeet - adults and kids also can easily learn how to create their own apron (without waste!) and after use it as a communicational platform. This also can be used as well in the workshops as well in the kitchen at home.

Anna at 12:13, 25 January 2017

2017-01-25T12:13:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:13, 25 January 2017
Line 43:		Line 43:
	But the author is about to reveal the positive side of this openness - how can we use this to be as creative as we can, and this book is the defence of sharing ideas. A good example is Wikipedia. Yet it's anarchy too - no one is in control, also democracy - there are votes what should be out, and also aristocracy - someone who's longer in the community has the higher position in it. maybe that's why its quality is questionable. on the other hand it may be more up to date, than Encyclopedia Britannica. But many cannot afford to compare the two- that's why Wikipedia is message, that the more we share the richer we get. However it is founded with a few staff, almost no money and it built up itself.		But the author is about to reveal the positive side of this openness - how can we use this to be as creative as we can, and this book is the defence of sharing ideas. A good example is Wikipedia. Yet it's anarchy too - no one is in control, also democracy - there are votes what should be out, and also aristocracy - someone who's longer in the community has the higher position in it. maybe that's why its quality is questionable. on the other hand it may be more up to date, than Encyclopedia Britannica. But many cannot afford to compare the two- that's why Wikipedia is message, that the more we share the richer we get. However it is founded with a few staff, almost no money and it built up itself.
	But there is the classic thinking - what's the point about doing this, if I don't profit from it in the end? Even though, this century is about what we share/give away - that's what define ourselves.		But there is the classic thinking - what's the point about doing this, if I don't profit from it in the end? Even though, this century is about what we share/give away - that's what define ourselves.

			=== My future scenario ===
			What if in 15 years communicating, sharing ideas, storytelling is going transform?
			What if we won’t need words, sentences to communicate, only using non-verbal, visual language. Also the platforms gonna remain digital - sharing ideas, storytelling are purely based on platforms like Instagram, Twitter, Facebook.
			As my project is based upon the idea of gathering culinary heritage from people/children and share it/ preserve it in a unique way.
			What if we will have to use every single surface to communicate? even our tools will be communication devices.
			So in my project i suggest the idea of preserving the good, the bad, the weird, the horrible and even combination of these things. Using the kitchen tools as communication devices - the most important surface we have, are the kitchen textiles - towels, aprons.
			I used this as an opportunity to share, preserve, reuse. Creating a method which can be a working method in the neighborhood. Storytelling and triggering creativity.
			This can be easily created with the workshops of Bouwkeet - adults and kids also can easily learn how to create their own apron (without waste!) and after use it as a communicational platform. This also can be used as well in the workshops as well in the kitchen at home.

Anna: /* sharing knowledge */

2016-11-30T21:54:01Z

sharing knowledge

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:54, 30 November 2016
Line 41:		Line 41:
	Sharing knowledge is so easy since we are connected virtually. being connected and sharing things online has also its advantages and disadvantages as well. Online presence allow us to join a big community which doesn't know rich or poor people - you have the same access to education, culture, daily politics as everybody else. it makes this platform democratic and equal. But this has a dark side as well.		Sharing knowledge is so easy since we are connected virtually. being connected and sharing things online has also its advantages and disadvantages as well. Online presence allow us to join a big community which doesn't know rich or poor people - you have the same access to education, culture, daily politics as everybody else. it makes this platform democratic and equal. But this has a dark side as well.
	Charles Leadbeater says in his book 'We think' that we are what we share. It can make our lives easier or maybe worse, so we have to be cautious about the content. Also If we are talking about design, many would think this kind of freedom isn't that good - what about free access to millions of songs, how is the artist respected? Or what about traditional forms of sharing knowledge - books, newspapers, magazines? And also, how can we trust the sources of information if they are edited by millions of people?		Charles Leadbeater says in his book 'We think' that we are what we share. It can make our lives easier or maybe worse, so we have to be cautious about the content. Also If we are talking about design, many would think this kind of freedom isn't that good - what about free access to millions of songs, how is the artist respected? Or what about traditional forms of sharing knowledge - books, newspapers, magazines? And also, how can we trust the sources of information if they are edited by millions of people?
	But the author is about to reveal the positive side of this openness - how can we use this to be as creative as we can, and this book is the defence of sharing ideas. A good example is Wikipedia. Yet it's anarchy too - no one is in control, also democracy - there are votes what should be out, and also aristocracy - someone who's longer in the community has the higher position in it. maybe that's why its quality is questionable. on the other hand it may be more up to date, than Encyclopedia Britannica. But many cannot afford to compare the two- that's why Wikipedia is message, that the more we share the richer we get. However it is founded with a few staff, almost no money and it built up itself.		But the author is about to reveal the positive side of this openness - how can we use this to be as creative as we can, and this book is the defence of sharing ideas. A good example is Wikipedia. Yet it's anarchy too - no one is in control, also democracy - there are votes what should be out, and also aristocracy - someone who's longer in the community has the higher position in it. maybe that's why its quality is questionable. on the other hand it may be more up to date, than Encyclopedia Britannica. But many cannot afford to compare the two- that's why Wikipedia is message, that the more we share the richer we get. However it is founded with a few staff, almost no money and it built up itself.
			But there is the classic thinking - what's the point about doing this, if I don't profit from it in the end? Even though, this century is about what we share/give away - that's what define ourselves.

Anna: /* sharing knowledge */

2016-11-30T21:42:26Z

sharing knowledge

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:42, 30 November 2016
Line 41:		Line 41:
	Sharing knowledge is so easy since we are connected virtually. being connected and sharing things online has also its advantages and disadvantages as well. Online presence allow us to join a big community which doesn't know rich or poor people - you have the same access to education, culture, daily politics as everybody else. it makes this platform democratic and equal. But this has a dark side as well.		Sharing knowledge is so easy since we are connected virtually. being connected and sharing things online has also its advantages and disadvantages as well. Online presence allow us to join a big community which doesn't know rich or poor people - you have the same access to education, culture, daily politics as everybody else. it makes this platform democratic and equal. But this has a dark side as well.
	Charles Leadbeater says in his book 'We think' that we are what we share. It can make our lives easier or maybe worse, so we have to be cautious about the content. Also If we are talking about design, many would think this kind of freedom isn't that good - what about free access to millions of songs, how is the artist respected? Or what about traditional forms of sharing knowledge - books, newspapers, magazines? And also, how can we trust the sources of information if they are edited by millions of people?		Charles Leadbeater says in his book 'We think' that we are what we share. It can make our lives easier or maybe worse, so we have to be cautious about the content. Also If we are talking about design, many would think this kind of freedom isn't that good - what about free access to millions of songs, how is the artist respected? Or what about traditional forms of sharing knowledge - books, newspapers, magazines? And also, how can we trust the sources of information if they are edited by millions of people?
	But the author is about to reveal the positive side of this openness - how can we use this to be as creative as we can, and this book is the defence of sharing ideas. A good example is Wikipedia. Yet it's anarchy too - no one is in control, also democracy - there are votes what should be out, and also aristocracy - someone who's longer in the community has the higher position in it. maybe that's why its quality is questionable.		But the author is about to reveal the positive side of this openness - how can we use this to be as creative as we can, and this book is the defence of sharing ideas. A good example is Wikipedia. Yet it's anarchy too - no one is in control, also democracy - there are votes what should be out, and also aristocracy - someone who's longer in the community has the higher position in it. maybe that's why its quality is questionable. on the other hand it may be more up to date, than Encyclopedia Britannica. But many cannot afford to compare the two- that's why Wikipedia is message, that the more we share the richer we get. However it is founded with a few staff, almost no money and it built up itself.

Anna: /* sharing knowledge */

2016-11-30T21:35:06Z

sharing knowledge

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:35, 30 November 2016
Line 41:		Line 41:
	Sharing knowledge is so easy since we are connected virtually. being connected and sharing things online has also its advantages and disadvantages as well. Online presence allow us to join a big community which doesn't know rich or poor people - you have the same access to education, culture, daily politics as everybody else. it makes this platform democratic and equal. But this has a dark side as well.		Sharing knowledge is so easy since we are connected virtually. being connected and sharing things online has also its advantages and disadvantages as well. Online presence allow us to join a big community which doesn't know rich or poor people - you have the same access to education, culture, daily politics as everybody else. it makes this platform democratic and equal. But this has a dark side as well.
	Charles Leadbeater says in his book 'We think' that we are what we share. It can make our lives easier or maybe worse, so we have to be cautious about the content. Also If we are talking about design, many would think this kind of freedom isn't that good - what about free access to millions of songs, how is the artist respected? Or what about traditional forms of sharing knowledge - books, newspapers, magazines? And also, how can we trust the sources of information if they are edited by millions of people?		Charles Leadbeater says in his book 'We think' that we are what we share. It can make our lives easier or maybe worse, so we have to be cautious about the content. Also If we are talking about design, many would think this kind of freedom isn't that good - what about free access to millions of songs, how is the artist respected? Or what about traditional forms of sharing knowledge - books, newspapers, magazines? And also, how can we trust the sources of information if they are edited by millions of people?
	But the author is about to reveal the positive side of this openness - how can we use this to be as creative as we can, and this book is the defence of sharing ideas. A good example is Wikipedia.		But the author is about to reveal the positive side of this openness - how can we use this to be as creative as we can, and this book is the defence of sharing ideas. A good example is Wikipedia. Yet it's anarchy too - no one is in control, also democracy - there are votes what should be out, and also aristocracy - someone who's longer in the community has the higher position in it. maybe that's why its quality is questionable.

Anna: /* The Cards */

2016-11-30T21:28:19Z

The Cards

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:28, 30 November 2016
Line 36:		Line 36:
	[[File:heritage_for_foreigners.jpg\|200p]]		[[File:heritage_for_foreigners.jpg\|200p]]
	[[File:heritage_for_foreigners2.jpg\|200p]]		[[File:heritage_for_foreigners2.jpg\|200p]]


			====sharing knowledge====
			Sharing knowledge is so easy since we are connected virtually. being connected and sharing things online has also its advantages and disadvantages as well. Online presence allow us to join a big community which doesn't know rich or poor people - you have the same access to education, culture, daily politics as everybody else. it makes this platform democratic and equal. But this has a dark side as well.
			Charles Leadbeater says in his book 'We think' that we are what we share. It can make our lives easier or maybe worse, so we have to be cautious about the content. Also If we are talking about design, many would think this kind of freedom isn't that good - what about free access to millions of songs, how is the artist respected? Or what about traditional forms of sharing knowledge - books, newspapers, magazines? And also, how can we trust the sources of information if they are edited by millions of people?
			But the author is about to reveal the positive side of this openness - how can we use this to be as creative as we can, and this book is the defence of sharing ideas. A good example is Wikipedia.

Anna: /* The Cards */

2016-10-06T12:02:35Z

The Cards

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:02, 6 October 2016
Line 33:		Line 33:
	==== The Cards ====		==== The Cards ====
	I made similar cards for the people I want to ask about their heritage. They can write down what is it about, where is it from - I even give the possibility to draw, or write - simple and more creative answers. And the rest is similar to my card: they can write down the ingredients, and how is it made, they could even add a little fun fact about the food.		I made similar cards for the people I want to ask about their heritage. They can write down what is it about, where is it from - I even give the possibility to draw, or write - simple and more creative answers. And the rest is similar to my card: they can write down the ingredients, and how is it made, they could even add a little fun fact about the food.

	[[File:heritage_for_foreigners.jpg\|200p]]		[[File:heritage_for_foreigners.jpg\|200p]]
	[[File:heritage_for_foreigners2.jpg\|200p]]		[[File:heritage_for_foreigners2.jpg\|200p]]

Anna: /* The Cards */

2016-10-06T12:02:12Z

The Cards

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:02, 6 October 2016
Line 34:		Line 34:
	I made similar cards for the people I want to ask about their heritage. They can write down what is it about, where is it from - I even give the possibility to draw, or write - simple and more creative answers. And the rest is similar to my card: they can write down the ingredients, and how is it made, they could even add a little fun fact about the food.		I made similar cards for the people I want to ask about their heritage. They can write down what is it about, where is it from - I even give the possibility to draw, or write - simple and more creative answers. And the rest is similar to my card: they can write down the ingredients, and how is it made, they could even add a little fun fact about the food.
	[[File:heritage_for_foreigners.jpg\|200p]]		[[File:heritage_for_foreigners.jpg\|200p]]
	[[File:heritage_for_foreigners2.jpg\|~~thumbnail~~]]		[[File:heritage_for_foreigners2.jpg\|200p]]

Anna: /* The Cards */

2016-10-06T12:01:27Z

The Cards

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:01, 6 October 2016
Line 34:		Line 34:
	I made similar cards for the people I want to ask about their heritage. They can write down what is it about, where is it from - I even give the possibility to draw, or write - simple and more creative answers. And the rest is similar to my card: they can write down the ingredients, and how is it made, they could even add a little fun fact about the food.		I made similar cards for the people I want to ask about their heritage. They can write down what is it about, where is it from - I even give the possibility to draw, or write - simple and more creative answers. And the rest is similar to my card: they can write down the ingredients, and how is it made, they could even add a little fun fact about the food.
	[[File:heritage_for_foreigners.jpg\|200p]]		[[File:heritage_for_foreigners.jpg\|200p]]
			[[File:heritage_for_foreigners2.jpg\|thumbnail]]