Difference between revisions of "Talk:Courses/Hybrid publishing"
From Publication Station
(Created page with "It might be interesting to use the opportunity to ask: * how teachers see electronic publishing in arts education context * can it function a learning tool/incentive, while al...") |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* how teachers see electronic publishing in arts education context | * how teachers see electronic publishing in arts education context | ||
* can it function a learning tool/incentive, while also serving to communicate the work developed by students and tutors? | * can it function a learning tool/incentive, while also serving to communicate the work developed by students and tutors? | ||
* how do they see the epub format | * how do they see the epub format | ||
Line 7: | Line 8: | ||
* should it exist only as the off line version of a website, or there other reasons for its existence? | * should it exist only as the off line version of a website, or there other reasons for its existence? | ||
* is it an interesting format for publishing? | * is it an interesting format for publishing? | ||
* where are the difficulties in adopting (electronic) publishing? | * where are the difficulties in adopting (electronic) publishing? |
Revision as of 09:29, 14 January 2016
It might be interesting to use the opportunity to ask:
- how teachers see electronic publishing in arts education context
- can it function a learning tool/incentive, while also serving to communicate the work developed by students and tutors?
- how do they see the epub format
- does it have any advantage over web?
- should it exist only as the off line version of a website, or there other reasons for its existence?
- is it an interesting format for publishing?
- where are the difficulties in adopting (electronic) publishing?