Difference between revisions of "Talk:Courses/Hybrid publishing"

From Publication Station
(Created page with "It might be interesting to use the opportunity to ask: * how teachers see electronic publishing in arts education context * can it function a learning tool/incentive, while al...")
 
Line 2: Line 2:
* how teachers see electronic publishing in arts education context
* how teachers see electronic publishing in arts education context
* can it function a learning tool/incentive, while also serving to communicate the work developed by students and tutors?
* can it function a learning tool/incentive, while also serving to communicate the work developed by students and tutors?


* how do they see the epub format
* how do they see the epub format
Line 7: Line 8:
* should it exist only as the off line version of a website, or there other reasons for its existence?
* should it exist only as the off line version of a website, or there other reasons for its existence?
* is it an interesting format for publishing?
* is it an interesting format for publishing?


* where are the difficulties in adopting (electronic) publishing?
* where are the difficulties in adopting (electronic) publishing?

Revision as of 09:29, 14 January 2016

It might be interesting to use the opportunity to ask:

  • how teachers see electronic publishing in arts education context
  • can it function a learning tool/incentive, while also serving to communicate the work developed by students and tutors?


  • how do they see the epub format
  • does it have any advantage over web?
  • should it exist only as the off line version of a website, or there other reasons for its existence?
  • is it an interesting format for publishing?


  • where are the difficulties in adopting (electronic) publishing?